Editor’s note: Welcome to the twentieth of a 24-part series dissecting the 81st Academy Awards, brought to you by the Large Association of Movie Blogs and its assorted members. Every day leading up to the Oscars, a new post written by a different LAMB will be published, each covering a different category of the Oscars. To read any other posts regarding this event, please click the tag following the post. Thank you, and enjoy!
By Nayana of The Center Seat.
As I’ve complained ad nauseum on The Center Seat, I’ve been a very bad film geek this year. I’ll spare you the gory details, but life has conspired… and I’ve actually had to make a conscious effort to see all the 2009 Oscar films. But still, I thought I was doing pretty well… until Fletch assigned me Best Actress, a category in which I had, at that point, seen only one of the nominated films!
Actually, it was a good thing. I got off my booty and went to the theater (and, in one case, Blockbuster), and now I can hold my head up in the LAMB’s distinguished company. So, here we go.
Melissa Leo, Frozen River
This was a gripping story about a recently single mother who resorts to border smuggling to pay the bills–and it’s the Canadian border. Cool twist, right? We’re saturated with Mexico border stories, so this was refreshing. And I have to say… maybe it was the snowy backdrop, or the northern accent, or the raw desperation to keep her head above water, but I saw a lot of people I know in Melissa Leo’s character. She’s real, frank, unadorned, the anti-glamour-puss. Of course a lot of the credit for that must be shared with the person who created the character: screenwriter Courtney Hunt, who is also nominated.
Leo is fairly unknown; a quick perusal of her IMDB page reveals lots of guest stints on Law & Order and CSI, and roles in various obscure films, perhaps the least obscure of which is Mr. Woodcock. Did you see that one? Yeah, me neither.
I’m actually really cool with Leo’s obscurity. How great would it be if relative unknowns were nominated at every Academy Awards? Of course she doesn’t have a chance in hell, but it’ll be nice to see her there Sunday night.
Meryl Streep – Doubt
Meryl Streep has gotten fifteen Academy Award nominations. Fifteen. That’s more than any other actor or actress in the history of the Oscars. I’m sure there’s a chair somewhere in the Kodak Theatre with Meryl’s ass-print permanently molded onto the seat.
Still, it shouldn’t be a surprise. Girlfriend can act. Overall, Doubt was a bit depressing for me (it’s the story of a priest who may or may not have misbehaved with one of his school’s young male students), but it was one of those movies that seemed custom-built as a showcase for great acting. And, naturally, Streep didn’t disappoint. She portrayed a harsh, militant nun who suspected the priest of wrongdoing and did all she could to prove herself right. That character had so much potential to be flat and uncomplicated, but Streep gave her flashes of humanity, with a fleeting look of uncertainty or a slight shaking of the hands. This is one case in which the actress seems to have made the character who she was. But, fairly or not, that’s what we’ve come to expect of Meryl Streep. Anything less than perfection in her would be a disappointment. Kind of a tough place to put her in, huh? Whatever. She’s got fifteen Oscar nominations.
Kate Winslet – The Reader
I came to this movie with the distinct disadvantage of having read the book. We all know that books tend to far surpass their movie adaptations. Nevertheless, I really enjoyed this movie, with its raw sexuality and complicated morality.
It’s hard to think of a more complicated, conflicted character to challenge Kate Winslet. In this movie, she played an illiterate Nazi war criminal who has an affair with a 16-year-old boy. It’s kind of Summer of ’42-meets-Judgment at Nuremberg-meets-…I don’t know… a Lifetime movie about illiteracy. Of course Winslet pulls it off. She is somehow able to portray vulnerability and pride simultaneously, but perhaps her greatest feat is that we forget about Kate Winslet and instead become wholly absorbed in the story. This is a case, in contrast to Doubt, in which the acting is merely a part of the experience of the film.
Anne Hathaway – Rachel Getting Married
This is it. We are officially no longer allowed to dismiss Anne Hathaway as Princess Mia. I think we all suspected she was awesome (how much ass did she kick in Brokeback?) but now, there it is in black and white. She is a contender for the Academy Award for Best Actress.
It wasn’t just handed to her either. In a film which was sometimes difficult to watch, Hathaway delivered a stunning performance as a recovering addict trying to fit in with her family upon her return from rehab. She’s the classic black sheep, but the issues go deeper than that. In fact, the myriad issues of this textbook dysfunctional family explode at perhaps the worst possible time: the days surrounding the wedding of the “good” sister.
I have never seen Anne Hathaway like this. She knocked me on my ass. Frankly, she would absolutely get my vote for this particular Oscar, if it had not been for the final contender in this category…
Angelina Jolie – Changeling
I get a lot of flak from people I respect (Pistola, I’m talking to you) about my professional regard for Ms. Jolie. In this case, it’s sometimes hard to distinguish feelings about Jolie’s personal choices from judgment of her acting ability. Many people dismiss her as a skank/homewrecker/baby factory/whatever, and I’m not necessarily arguing with that. But I have always been a fan of Angelina Jolie the actress. From her first major role as a doomed supermodel in Gia, to her Oscar-winning turn as a sociopathic mental patient in Girl, Interrupted, to her heartbreaking portrayal of her own friend Marianne Pearl in A Mighty Heart, to this most recent role as a bereaved mother in Changeling, Angelina Jolie is a devastating actress. Her work speaks for itself.
I was shaking after I saw Changeling… Jolie is heartbreaking as a mother who tirelessly fights to find her lost son, even angering police and being thrown in a mental institution in the process. Of course she’s a great actress, but she brought something outstanding to this particular role. We all know, regardless of our personal feelings for her, that she loves her kids. In addition, she lost her own mother shortly before starting filming on Changeling. Perhaps it was this personal experience that allowed her to lay herself open on screen in such a raw way.
I am going to unabashedly throw my full support behind Angelina Jolie for this Oscar. But the truth is, no matter who wins this year, we can’t lose. The Academy has nominated five outstanding actresses, and whoever wins will do so because of merit, and not because of pity, or politics, or “it’s about time”, as in certain previous years (Halle Berry, I’m looking at you.)
Your comment about Halle Berry made me laugh out loud in my office… awesome. I agree with your run down, but I have to put my support behind Anne on this one, as Rachel Getting Married was the best movie I saw this year, and it was totally snubbed for best pic.
Rachel Getting Married was extremely well done, but difficult to watch. Nuevo Man had a visceral (negative) reaction… I may blog about that. But Anne Hathaway was spectacular. And, yeah, I was behind her until I saw Changeling. Well, we’ll see. I’ll still be happy if Anne wins. Actually, I’ll be thrilled if she wins.
Excellent write-up. I finally saw Frozen River and was knocked out. You said it, this is a tough year, with some solid competition. I love an underdog and thought “Rachel” was the best treatment of addiction and family done by Hollywood in forever, and Hathaway kicked serious ass. I’d love to see her get recognized, but I think this is Kate’s Oscar this year.
Melissa Leo had a very high-profile role on the best TV show in history: Homicide: Life on the Streets. I’m very sorry that you don’t relate to that part of her career, which is a shining point in the annals of film/TV.
Nayana-
This is a terrifc article. While I don’t share your enthusiasm for Streep’s performance or “The Reader” in general, I really enjoyed reading this.
Of course, my personal choice for Best Actress – Sally Hawkins in “Happy Go Lucky” – was totally overlooked by the Academy, so I’m none too thrilled about this category. I think Winslet will win, and I’m fine with that.
Marilyn, I’m sorry I missed that too. I’ve never actually caught “Homicide”… I think I may have been a bit too young back when it was on.
Tommy & Pat… you may be right about Kate. She has it coming, after all, and that does seem to be how the Academy rolls. But I’m really holding out for Anne or Angelina.
I second that comment about Leo’s contribution to the BEST cop show ever, HOMICIDE. She was terrific on that show. That said, though I’m pulling for Streep (who had a difficult job convincing us that her character was human), I still am miffed that the year’s best lead actress–Michelle Williams in WENDY AND LUCY–wasn’t nominated. Neither was the year’s second best actress–Sally Hawkins in HAPPY-GO-LUCKY. Add them into the mix (and get rid of Jolie and Winslet) and you’ve got a real race.
情趣商品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣用品,情趣商品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣用品,情趣商品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品.情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,視訊聊天室
麻將,台灣彩卷,六合彩開獎號碼,運動彩卷,六合彩,遊戲,線上遊戲,cs online,搓麻將,矽谷麻將,明星三缺一, 橘子町,麻將大悶鍋,台客麻將,公博,game,淘,中華職棒,麗的線上小遊戲,國士無雙麻將,麻將館,賭博遊戲,威力彩,威力彩開獎號碼,龍龍運動網,史萊姆,史萊姆好玩遊戲,史萊姆第一個家,史萊姆好玩遊戲區,樂透彩開獎號碼,遊戲天堂,天堂,好玩遊戲,遊戲基地,無料遊戲王,好玩遊戲區,麻將遊戲,好玩遊戲區,小遊戲,電玩快打
情趣用品,情趣,A片,AIO,AV,AV女優,A漫,免費A片,情色,情色貼圖,色情小說,情色文學,色情,寄情竹園小遊戲,色情遊戲,AIO交友愛情館,色情影片,情趣內衣,情趣睡衣,性感睡衣,情趣商品,微風成人,嘟嘟成人網,成人,18成人,成人影城,成人圖片,成人貼圖,成人圖片區,UT聊天室,聊天室,豆豆聊天室 ,哈啦聊天室,尋夢園聊天室,聊天室尋夢園,080苗栗人聊天室,080聊天室,視訊交友網,視訊
借錢,黃金,黃金回收,黃金價格,黃金買賣,當舖
A片,A片,成人網站,成人影片,色情,情色網,情色,AV,AV女優,成人影城,成人,色情A片,日本AV,免費成人影片,成人影片,SEX,免費A片,A片下載,免費A片下載,做愛,情色A片,色情影片,H漫,A漫,18成人
a片,色情影片,情色電影,a片,色情,情色網,情色,av,av女優,成人影城,成人,色情a片,日本av,免費成人影片,成人影片,情色a片,sex,免費a片,a片下載,免費a片下載,成人網站,做愛,自拍