The LAMB Devours the Oscars – Best Film Editing

by Dylan · February 8, 2008 · LAMB Devours the Oscars · 10 Comments

Editor’s note: Welcome to the tenth of a multi-part series dissecting the 2008 Academy Awards, brought to you by the Large Association of Movie Blogs and its assorted members. Every weekday leading up to the Oscars, a new post written by a different LAMB will be published, each covering a different category (or more) of the Oscars (there are 24 in all). To read any other posts regarding this event, please just click on the tag following the post. Thank you, and enjoy!


By * (Asterisk) of Movie Reviews (such as they are).

The second edition of The Macmillan International Film Encyclopedia (Ephraim Katz, 1994) says that “film editing is a laborious, exacting, multistage process that is both a craft and an art”, and “an editor invests weeks or months of intensive work to achieve the impression that he has done nothing at all”.

Yep, that’s an editor’s lot. He (or she; and Katz reminds us that “editing has been one of the few movie crafts wide open to women […] because it requires manual dexterity”) strives to maintain the “voice” and integrity of the creator of the original work, while at the same time bringing a new perspective and a “distance” from the project that can, hopefully, help create a better end result.

I know a bit about editing, albeit a different type of editing. For a day job, I edit books and magazines. So I understand perfectly well the notion of trying to cram X amount of information into Y amount of space (or, in the case of a film, time).

There are some commentators who would suggest that editing one’s own film is a fool’s errand. That closeness to the work is a hurdle to overcome, and the director/editor may be reluctant to rid his film of elements that others would have no qualms about losing. And while I think this idea is valid in the realms of literary editing, I think it is not a fair parallel to make. After all, literary editing is about correcting grammar, spelling, and syntax mistakes at least as much as making something read better and fit a predefined space.

In film, there is less mistake-correcting to do (in an ideal world!). In his book Digital Film-Making, director Mike Figgis writes: “It’s good to have an editor to work with in post-production [but] it’s vitally important that you don’t lose the plot […]. You can’t just abdicate your responsibility.” And this, surely, is tacit endorsement of the role of director/editor, which Figgis tell us, is “much more common now” than it used to be. That, of course, is largely as a result of the boom in digital and low-budget film-making.

And the mention of digital brings us to the name of this award. There have long been discussions over the nouns “film” and “movie” to mean what we see projected on a cinema screen. Oliver Stone once claimed that he makes movies while Quentin Tarantino makes films. There’s a sense of “a film” being smaller, and so a less impressive cinema-going, visual extravaganza, than “a movie”. Jules et Jim is a film, but Independence Day is a movie.

The difference between film and movie, of course, has a different bent when talking about editing. The term “film editing”, as used by the Academy for this award, has an implication of physically handling and splicing film, but as time goes by, fewer and fewer people are editing their work this way. Directors such as Robert Rodriguez have been prime exponents of this do-it-yourself ethic. “Some people say that cutting on film […] gives the filmmaker a much closer relationship to the film,” Rodriguez writes in Rebel Without a Crew. “If you like the sound of that, do yourself a favor and take some film home at night and fondle it all you want. But when it comes time to cut your movie use a video or computer system. Cutting on film is the slowest, most absurd way to cut a film in my opinion. It takes forever to do anything.”

Given the move towards digital editing across the board these days, maybe the Academy should consider renaming this award the Movie Editing award. This trend away from cutting celluloid is great for those who wish to be involved all the way through the process without necessarily wanting to learn a whole new discipline. You can teach yourself the basics on a computer in your home. This is one prime reason why the aforementioned director/editor tag is becoming more commonplace, but some people just want to be involved at every stage — from Orson Welles to the Coen brothers, the director/editor actually has a long pedigree.

And on the subject of the Coen brothers, they are, of course, among the nominees for this year’s Academy Award for Film Editing, for No Country for Old Men under their pseudonym Roderick Jaynes.

Of the five movies nominated, this is the only one I have seen as yet. Personally, I thought the editing was strong throughout… until the last 20 minutes or so. Shorten that coda, boys, and maybe clarify what the hell is going on it that hotel room between Ed Tom and Anton, then maybe we’ll talk about you getting that Oscar.

The other four films are:

The Bourne Ultimatum, Christopher Rouse.
If Rouse’s work on this is as good as on the same director’s United 93, this should be a hot contender.

The Diving Bell and the Butterfly, Juliette Welfling
First-time nomination for Welfling on this critically acclaimed feature. Going by her work on the very good Read My Lips and the somewhat disappointing but interesting The Beat That My Heart Skipped, I’d say she can’t be counted out.

Into the Wild, Jay Cassidy
Another first-time nominee. Good for them. Does that mean they’re patsies, though? Hmm… We’ll see.

There Will Be Blood, Dylan Tichenor
And yet another first-time nominee… But, whoa, look at this guy’s pedigree: Boogie Nights and Magnolia alone should secure this guy a lifetime-achievement award some day. He also edited Brokeback Mountain and The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford. He should be commended for his work ethic alone: There Will Be Blood, The Assassination of Jesse James…, and Brokeback, back to back! That’s some feat.

So, I know it wasn’t part of the brief, but if I were a gambling man and I had to bet my shirt on someone in this category, I’d be putting it on Dylan Tichenor. I’ll be seeing this as soon as it opens over here in the UK, so if I change my mind you’ll be the first to know!

I’m done here now. Guess I’ll put on my editor’s hat and go through it all again.

Tags: ,

10 Responses to The LAMB Devours the Oscars – Best Film Editing

  1. WaywardJam says:

    I really enjoyed the history behind film editing, you provide a nice perspective for thinking about the nominees.

    I’ve only seen three of these but my vote would also be for Tichenor, though I think he’ll be a dead heat with the Coen brothers.

  2. Nick says:

    Damn, that was an in-depth article. I love film editing. I love editing my own work. It’s tedious, but it’s fun to see the end result. Also, like you, I edit writing and such, as well.

    Though I agree, Tichenor is probably going to be the winner… Blood, Jesse James, and Brokeback… this guy’s good.

  3. Jed says:

    you wrote a very interesting and insightful article, thanks! enjoyed it very much.

    I hope the guy who did the editing for Blood (Tichenor) win the award, he’s such a tremendous talent.

    Oh, I would really like to take exception to the term ‘disappointing’ as a description to ‘The Beat that my Heart skipped’ I love that movie from beginning to end, while you said Duris’ performance alone is enough to watch it, I think there is lots of ‘substance and form’ to warrant a more extensive analysis of the film.

    Oh, I’m off topic, but hey, this is a cool article and I’m sure to read more of your blog, it’s cool man!

    Juliette Wlefing should have been nominated in Read My Lips, as you mentioned. That is an awesome movie!

  4. Daniel G. says:

    Nice one. I’ve seen all 5 nominees and think that Bourne was probably the sharpest, but my bet is No Country will likely take it as it sweeps through the categories.

  5. Pat says:

    Great article. I really enjoyed the history and background that you provided.

    I’m with you on “There Will Be Blood” – feels like the winner to me.

  6. Nice article!

    I would love Bourne to take this, but as most people here, I think it will be a race between Blood and No Country. I really can’t decide…

  7. Jess says:

    Hey all,
    Bourne won the BAFTA award for editing, so perhaps it’s not out of the running! Though Blood wasn’t even included in the nominees.

  8. Good article… very thorough.

    My money’s on No Country, but I really wish The Diving Bell and the Butterfly would get some love. That movie was dazzling.

  9. * (asterisk) says:

    Thanks for the great feedback, everyone (hey, Fletch is conspicuously absent..!). I really enjoyed writing this article, so it’s nice that it’s been so well received.

    Jed: Sorry we don’t see wholly eye to eye on The Beat TMHS! I like it quite a lot, but I was expecting yet more. It was named as one of the films of the year in Sight & Sound magazine, so I had very high expectations.

  10. princess says:



    Download mp3 songs, Video songs, Wallpapers or Full Movie

    (Bollywood, Hollywood, Telugu and Tamil Movies)
    Download mp3 songs

    Download or Watch Online Video Songs

    Download Full Movie

    Download Wallpapers of Actress

    Download Movie Wallpapers

    Download mp3 songs, Video songs, Wallpapers or Full Movie

    Latest Topics of this site :

    Download Bhoothnath Video Songs

    Download Meet Bill Hollywood Movie(2008)

    Download Baby Mama movie(2008)

    Download Love Songs Bollywood movie (2008)

    Download Pandi Songs (2008)

    Watch or Download Akku movie (2008)

    Download What Happens In Vegas movie(2008)

    Download War, Inc. movie(2008)

    Download my mom’s new boyfriend movie (2008)

    Download chennai superkings songs

    Download Aayutham Seivom songs (2008)

    Download Speed Racer Movie (2008)

    Download Khushboo songs (2008)

    Download Bhootnath movie (2008)

    Download sonal chauhan Actress Wallpapers

    Download Katherine Heigl Wallpapers

    Download ileana Wallpapers

    Download Anamika Video songs (2008)

    Download Anamika movie(2008)

    Watch Sirf Video songs (2008)

    Watch Jalsa Video Songs (2008)

    Download Jalsa wallpapers (2008)

    Watch Kantri Video Songs (2008)

    Download Rang Rasiya Wallpapers (2008)

    Download Ankit, Pallavi & Friends Songs

    Download Anamika Songs (2008)

    Download Ghatothkach songs (2008)

    Download Jalsa (2008) telugu movie

    Download Kantri Wallpapers (2008)

    Download Raat Gayi Baat Gayi wallpapers (2008)

    Download Don Muthuswami video songs (2008)

    Download Don Muthuswami Songs (2008)

    Download Dhoom Dadakka Video Songs (2008)

    Download Hastey Hastey (2008) Wallpapers

    Download Dhoom Dadakka (2008) songs

    Download The Awakening (2008) Songs

    Download Hastey Hastey Video Songs

    Download Anushka Shetty Wallpapers

    Download Kalidasu Telugu Movie (2008)

    Download Too Hot Too Cool (2008) Songs, IPL POP

    Download Mr White Mr Black movie (2008)

    Download Hastey Hastey Songs (2008)

    Download Shamur Shardana Songs – Pop Album

    Download Sirf (2008) Movie

    Kuruvi Video Songs Download

    Download Tashan movie (2008)

    Download Katrina kaif Wallpapers

    Download Aashayein Wallpapers

    Download The Number 23 (2007) movie

    Download Vaana Telugu songs

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.